What does Tom Regan say about animal rights?
What does Tom Regan say about animal rights?
Abstract. Tom Regan argues that human beings and some non-human animals have moral rights because they are “subjects of lives,” that is, roughly, conscious, sentient beings with an experiential welfare.
Is Tom Regan vegan?
As a stalwart vegan and activist, his contribution will be greatly missed. The Vegan, Winter 2006, Archive. Tom Regan is Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at North Carolina State University. He is also an uncompromising ‘Animal Rights Advocate’ (ARA).
What ethical theory does Tom Regan use?
Kantian approach
In “The Case for Animal Rights,” Tom Regan takes a Kantian approach and believes that like humans, animals should be treated as ends-in-themselves.
How does Tom Regan criticize Peter Singer’s utilitarian reason for animal rights?
Unlike Singer, Regan argues against a utilitarianism perspective when considering animal equality. Utilitarianism has no room for the equal rights of different individuals because it has no room for their equal inherent value.
What does Tom Regan mean by inherent value?
Regan uses the term inherent value to express why he feels this way, inherent value in the case of animal ethics can be described as the value an animal possesses in its own right, as an end-in-itself, the opposite of this is instrumental value which means that an animal only has a value to other animals such as human …
What does Regan mean by being a subject of a life?
In other words, their being a subject-of-a-life revolves around the question whether their lives can be. better or worse. If this is the case, Regan considers them to be either moral subjects or patients and. hence, morally relevant.
What does Regan believe in for animals?
The Case for Animal Rights is a 1983 book by the American philosopher Tom Regan, in which the author argues that at least some kinds of non-human animals have moral rights because they are the “subjects-of-a-life,” and that these rights adhere to them whether or not they are recognized.
How does Reagan regard what he calls the cruelty kindness view of animal rights?
Cruelty-kindness view: Our behavior toward animals is acceptable as long as we are kind and not cruel to them. Regan points out that having a kind motive or failing to be cruel is no guarantee of right action.
Why does Regan reject utilitarianism?
What according to Regan is wrong with utilitarianism?
Regan believes that we have direct duties to animals. Utilitarianism, according to Regan, could be used to justify murder. Regan believes that animals have as much inherent value as humans.
What is the meaning of inherent value?
Inherent value, in relation to any land, means a value arising from an ecological, landscape, cultural, heritage, scientific attribute or characteristic of a natural resource or historic place Figure 1: Proportion of each cover type within each tenure type7 ‘CROWN-Non CPLA’ = Crown land not covered by the CPLA.
What is Regan’s position on animal rights quizlet?
a. True. Regan believes that animals have more inherent value than humans.